|
ISSUES IN MENTAL DISABILITY
LAW
DESCRIPTION
This elective provides the student
with an opportunity to undertake in-depth scholarly study of some
of the critical legal issues involving persons with mental disabilities.
There will be a general overview
of mental disability law and a review of some of the major cases
affecting mental health services. The elective will focus
on three issues: 1) the role of the psychiatrist in the implementation
of the death penalty, such as participation in the insanity defense,
competency to stand trial, testimony concerning fitness to be executed;
2) the effect of the major "patients' rights" lawsuits
on the quality of state mental health services, the impact of landmark
court decisions in improving institutional conditions, and Supreme
Court case law that sets out a standard for violation of constitutional
rights in institutions and assesses the impact that such suits may
have had directly or indirectly on the quality of care in state
institutions; and 3) the development and implementation of the right
to refuse psychotropic medication in Illinois and other states,
with emphasis on major cases defining such a right as well as studies
on the impact of such a right on the delivery of mental health services.
Each issue will be examined with
emphasis on the interaction between law and psychiatry. The
death penalty cases involve a potential moral dilemma of a psychiatrist
asked to perform an evaluation and thereby become part of a legal
process he or she may find objectionable. The institutional
quality cases show the effect of law on public policy, both on the
state bureaucracy as well as on the daily treatment and living conditions
of the patients. The right to refuse cases are the paradigm
of a conflict between the "medical model" and the "rights
model" in mental health service delivery.
OBJECTIVES
As a result of participating in
this elective and by using assigned cases [e.g., Youngberg v.
Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1972), Wyatt v. Stickney, 344 F
Supp. 373 (MD Ala. 1972)] and readings, which may include Michael
L. Perlin, Law and Mental Disability (1994), John Q. LaFond,
Back to the Asylum (1992); and David B. Wexler and Bruce
J. Winick, Essays in Therapeutic Jurisprudence (1992), the
student will be able to:
- Discuss the development of mental disability
law in the areas of civil commitment, a right to treatment in
the least restrictive environment, and rights in institutions.
- Describe the constitutional rights asserted
as the basis for increased procedural rights in civil commitment,
the right to treatment, and the right to refuse treatment.
- Describe the legal criteria for insanity
and fitness to stand trial and to be executed in capital crimes.
- Discuss the case law involving psychiatric
evaluation for aggravating and mitigating circumstances in death
penalty cases.
- Outline some effects of lawsuits involving
patients rights on the delivery of mental health services, at
both a statewide and hospital level.
- Discuss the constitutional and statutory
bases for a right to refuse treatment for patients in mental
health facilities.
- Discuss the clinical aspects of a right
to refuse treatment.
- Outline the effects of implementing the
right to refuse treatment in state operated facilities in Illinois.
EVALUATION
Evaluation will consist of daily
participation in seminar sessions, oral assessment of assigned readings,
and performance on an essay examination covering material studied
during the course of the elective.
PREREQUISITES
- Completion of all third-year clerkships
- Enrollment in the M.D./J.D. Dual Degree
Program
| Faculty Responsible for Elective |
David E. Goldman, D.O., J.D.
Psychiatrist/Attorney
Goldman Group, LLC
4000 Westgate
Springfield, IL 62707 |
| Telephone |
217/793-3200 |
| Additional Faculty |
Theodore
R. LeBlang, J.D.
tleblang@siumed.edu
|
Enrollment
Maximum number of students |
4 per experience |
| Schedule |
1 week; Full-time |
| Credit Hours |
1 non-clinical credit awarded |
MD/JD
Electives
Medical
Humanities Electives
|
|