|
|
INHALATIONAL AIRWAY INJURY DURING ILLICIT METHAMPHETAMINE PRODUCTIONKamaljit Dhaliwal, MD, Resident & Akshay Sood, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Medicine
Before transfer to the Burns Unit, the patient was intubated in the field by the paramedics, his eyes were irrigated with water, and a nasogastric tube and an indwelling urinary catheter was placed. His examination in the Burns Unit showed conjunctival erythema; lacrimation, thick nasal discharge, wheezing, throat and second degree skin burns (see Figure 1). His Laboratory reports were within normal limits. His arterial blood gases drawn on Assist Control mode of ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 cc/kg. body weight, respiratory rate of 12/minute, peep of 5 and FiO2 of 40% showed a pH of 7.48 and a PaCO2 of 32 mms. of Hg. and PaO2 of 70 mms. of Hg. His chest X-ray portable anteroposterior view is shown in Figure 2. Figure 1: Photograph of skin burns
Which ONE of the following is a possible cause of chemical inhalational lung injury during production of illicit methamphetamine?
Question 2: Which ONE of the following BEST describes the pathophysiology of the tissue injury caused by this chemical? Question 3: Which ONE of the following is not seen during the bronchoscopic examination of this patient’s airways? Question 4: Which ONE of the following statements is false? Question 5: Which ONE of the following may NOT be useful in the management of this patient? Question 6: Which ONE of the following is LEAST likely to be a late sequela of this exposure? References: |
|
| Comments?
Click
here to send us an e-mail. View our Site
Map Please note that specific medical questions can not be answered via this website. Copyright © 2006, Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University - Privacy Policy Page Last Updated June 26, 2008 |
||