![]() |
Minutes |
|
Educational Policy Committee February 14, 2000
|
|
Present:
Amber Barnhart, MD
Peter T. Borgia, PhD
Gregory J. Brewer, PhD
Linda H. Distlehorst, PhD
Gary Dunnington, MD
Charles E. Eberle, MD
Carl L. Faingold, PhD
Randy A. Kienstra, MD
Regina A. Kovach, MD
Jerry A. Kruse, MD
Theodore R. LeBlang, JD
Earl L. Loschen, MD
David S. Resch, MD
Sandra L. Shea, PhD
David E. Steward, MD
David R. Wade, PhD
Clint Farris, Class of 2002
Absent:
Ronald A. Browning, PhD
J. Kevin Dorsey, MD, PhD
Jaime A. Estavillo, PhD
Victoria Nichols, MD
Don E. Ramsey, MD
William Robinson, Class of 2000
Richard Markiewicz, Class of 2001
Matthew Lavery, Class of 2003
1.
Review of Minutes
The minutes were unanimously approved.
2.
Announcements
3.
Updates
3.1.
Curriculum Reports
3.1.1. Freshman Standard Curriculum Committee
Dr. Shea reported via Dr. Distlehorst that the Freshman Standard Curriculum was more than halfway through the Cardiovascular/Respiratory Block. This is the last block in which Dr. Hurley Myers will teach, since he is retiring next fall.
3.1.2 Problem-Based Learning Curriculum Committee
‑ Carbondale
Dr. Shea reported via Dr. Distlehorst that the students are in the ninth week of the twelve-week Sensorimotor Unit. Students have asked for and received additional practice with the neurological exam, and have had several sessions with a neurosurgeon.
3.1.3 Sophomore Standard Curriculum Committee
Dr. Borgia reported that the Sophomore Standard Curriculum Committee did not meet in January, and the curriculum seems to be going smoothly. The integrated Central Nervous System block began January 14. Students have expressed concern about the Radiology streamer and also have concerns about possible conflicts between CNS sessions and Radiology sessions. This issue will be explored.
3.1.4 Problem-Based
Learning Curriculum Committee ‑ Springfield
Dr. Loschen reported that students have nearly completed the third unit of the second year and will begin the final unit in a couple of weeks. Tutor/student roles have recently been discussed.
3.1.5 Committee
on Clerkships and Electives
Dr. Kovach reported that the Committee on Clerkships and Electives have been discussing the AAMC Graduation Questionnaire data and clerkship feedback reports from departments. The group also dealt with the concept of students taking clinical electives from family members. It was determined that, as long as the elective meets school expectations, it will be approved.
3.1.6. Physician
Attitudes and Conduct Curriculum
Dr. Barnhart reported that her efforts to date have been involved with developing PAC activities, rather than developing evaluation activities. In Curriculum 2000, PAC activities will be included in the Doctoring Streamer, but will be identified as PAC Activities. The Doctoring assessment activities will include PAC activities. Peer review will be a part of that process.
Dr. Constance added that peer assessment is used during the Medical Humanities course. Dr. Kovach reported that peer assessment is used in the Internal Medicine Clerkship and that it is has been an extremely valuable experience. Student comments are insightful and often add depth to faculty perceptions.
Dr. Distlehorst reported that the American Board of Internal Medicine had done a great deal of research and publication regarding peer assessment.
This area is to continue to be developed in the Curriculum 2000 Doctoring Group.
3.1.7. Curriculum 2000
Dr. Resch reported that the Steering Committee met on February 8 and had made two major decisions: 1) the third-year clerkships have developed a schedule that, in duration is similar to the current clerkship schedule, but will have content changes in keeping with Curriculum 2000 recommendations; and 2) created an operational structure that includes Curriculum Year Directors working with the Associate Dean and the Curriculum Segment Chairs to operationalize each year of the curriculum. Funding is available to offset the administrative time necessary for this function. This does not affect the EPC role in the curriculum. In response to a question regarding the status of the Curriculum Segment Chairs, it was suggested that Segment Chairs who do not wish to continue to serve in that capacity let their preferences be known.
4.
AAMC Graduation
Questionnaire
The comments and objective data from the AAMC Graduation Questionnaire related to diversity and student "mistreatment" were distributed.
§ It was suggested that the EPC ensure that these issues be covered in the new curriculum.
§ The importance of training residents to teach, work with, and assess students was also stressed. It appears that some residents do not know how to handle supervisory roles, and additional training might resolve some of these issues. It was suggested that some of these issues might be traced via other documentation and be specifically addressed with the appropriate faculty and residents.
§ It was noted that some students reported that they did not know where to go to report student abuse issues or felt that it was not "safe" to report the issues.
§ It was suggested that fourth-year students be given more training regarding teaching and assessment.
Dr. Constance
made a motion, seconded by Dr. Barnhart, to:
1) ask the GMEC to deal with the issue of medical student mistreatment
by continuing to offer training sessions for residents as teachers, 2) request
that C2000 include teaching and assessment skills, 3) request that the C2000
Faculty Development Group include this issue in its plan for faculty education;
and 4) identify with the hospital nursing structure the mechanisms for
intervening in the student perception of mistreatment by some of the nursing
staff. The motion passed unanimously
with one abstention.
Dr. Constance
made a motion, seconded by Dr. Barnhart, that a request be sent to Curriculum
2000 that diversity issues be incorporated into Curriculum 2000.
It was pointed out that, while students may not retain it, issues of ethnic medicine are currently covered in the curriculum. It was also suggested that faculty working within the C2000 Curriculum Segments might bring about the same results, and that the issue was bigger than a curriculum issue.
The motion
passed unanimously, with one abstention.
5.
Educational Value
Units
This issue was not discussed due to time constraints.
6.
Next Meeting
The next meeting of the Educational Policy Committee
will be held at 1:30 p.m. Monday, March
20, 2000, in the Lincoln Conference Room in Springfield and Lindegren
Conference Room 310 in Carbondale. Please note the change in date to
accommodate the University Spring Break holiday.