-
What do you look for when reviewing
an applicant’s elective experiences? What do you see as important?
-
Interest, reliability, inquisitive
nature, interest and participation in research and conferences, and
personality (pleasant, mature, self-directed).
-
An applicant’s elective experiences
are a very minor aspect of the application process. We would prefer
to see someone who has spent time on non-surgical electives such as
Medicine and Medicine specialties.
-
Does it demonstrate a balance
between good time utilization, experience in varied areas supporting
chosen specialty pursuit and chosen specialty to show knowledge of
that specialty?
-
An applicant interested in an
Otolaryngology residency should have a well-rounded elective
experience in critical care trauma as well as advanced medicine
rotations.
-
Good evaluations, good letters in
ortho. Nice to have honors in other electives/rotations.
-
The broad experience that the
applicant presents is important; however, in applying to a urology
program specifically obtaining honors in a urology elective or
general surgery elective or general surgery primary rotation are
considered important in reviewing an applicant’s application.
-
Do you prefer that an applicant have
a broad-based elective experience or a more specialized elective
experience before entering your residency? Why?
-
It does not matter – the important
aspects are in questions #1. It does help, though to know they had
an interest in our specialty.
-
We prefer applicants not focus on
surgical electives, but on electives that will prepare them to deal
with the patient as a whole, particularly medical problems in
surgical patients.
-
Broad-based – See #1.
-
Applicants should have a broad-based
elective experience that also has specific areas that are
specialties that are encountered during their senior year. This is
to help prepare them for a general surgery internship role which is
required prior to entering a four-year otolaryngology residency. In
particular, a resident should have a surgical sub-internship,
preferably in otolaryngology, but a general surgery rotation would
also suffice.
-
Just care about what they have done
in ortho and that a few people have gotten to know them well enough
to write a letter.
-
Again, a broad-based experience is
good, however, some evidence of rotation within the area of
specialty or in the region of specialty such as surgery, in the case
of urology, would be considered important. Receiving a positive
letter of recommendation or summary from a urologist or general
surgeon can make a difference in offering a chance to interview at a
program. This is especially true if the person who is evaluating
the candidate knows the person who wrote the letter of
recommendation of rotation summary.
-
What specific elective experiences
do you like applicants to have before entering your residency
program? (For example, general ward experience with in-house call,
basic science anatomy review, ambulatory clinical preceptorship,
etc.)
-
Again it is not important. They can
have a basic science or clinical elective – both could hold them in
good stand if they abide by question #1.
-
The ones we recommend include
Radiology, Cardiology, and Anatomic Cadaver Dissection appropriate
to surgical specialty, Research, Critical Care, and Renal Medicine.
-
Specialty area – spine – Student
needs ICU management, rehab experience, outpatient, patient
evaluation experiences.
-
Same as #2.
-
Surgical anatomy elective, surgical
skills (when it was available), 1-3 ortho electives.
-
The electives that are most
important are most often related to areas that will compliment their
ultimate selection of residency programs. For example, in urology,
having a good background in general medicine, infectious disease,
nephrology and intensive care along with a general surgical rotation
would all be considered beneficial.
-
What general advice (applicable to
the fourth year) do you have for students as they prepare for
entering a residency program in your field?
-
Follow characteristics of questions
#1; seek out research interests; start early (2nd year)
in getting our interests known.
-
Take opportunities to gain
experience in areas that are not part of the residency experience.
We would prefer they not spend a large portion of the fourth year
doing “audition electives”.
-
Take advantage of learning
opportunities available in the fourth year as it is your last chance
to delve into areas of your own choosing.
-
In general, applicants should have
board scores over 210 on USMLE Step One. They should have started
work on a research project. This does not have to be a basic
science project, but preferably is a project that they are working
on somewhat independently with the guidance of a faculty person or
resident. The student should aim for having the project well
underway by the time they begin interviewing for programs in the
fall.
-
Step I greater than 220. Get to
know as well: summer research, several electives. Honors in as
many clerkships as possible not just ortho.
-
The field of urology has become very
competitive for residency selection. Evidence of strong basic
science skills and a broad background during medical school is
important. Early contact with the Division of Urology is also
important because this will help in developing a relationship with
the Division members that would be beneficial for the student when
they apply to programs in urology. One of the strongest aspects of
interview selection in urology is a letter from someone known in the
field of urology recommending a student for a specific urology
program. Therefore, as general advice, the most important aspect is
to develop a relationship with an urologist so that they can help in
the selection of residency programs along with a letter of
recommendation.
-
What expectations does your
residency program have regarding research experiences? Are entering
residents expected to have engaged in or published research either
independently or in conjunction with others?
-
Two publications and two
presentations over 6 years in residency; entering residents will
stand a better chance if they are published or have research
experience since the competition is so great to get in.
-
We strongly prefer that applicants
have at least spent time engaged in research activities. Applicants
that have published research are clearly rated higher in our review
process.
-
Encouraged but not required.
-
Same as #4.
-
Research is commonly done by
candidates – I see it as a good way to demonstrate interest and also
to get to know the faculty well.
-
Our entering residents are not
expected to have done research in medical school. There are not
specific requirements for publications in order to be accepted in
the urology residency program; however, since the field is very
competitive having had experience and interest in either basic
science or clinical research is considered positive in reviewing
applicants.
-
What do you look for in USMLE
scores? How do you use them in evaluating a candidate’s
application?
-
USMLE scores account for 1/6 of our
scoring system to get people to the interim level. We interview
15-18 people. The scores mean little after this point.
-
USMLE Part I is used as one of the
initial screening criteria to determine whether or not an applicant
will be granted an interview. The scores are utilized along with
class rank, surgery clerkship grade, AOA membership, etc.
-
High scores makes the final cut.
-
These scores are used to screen
candidates. The scores that are lower than 200 generally are
considered indicative of students that may have difficulty passing
their residency boards. Most otolaryngology residency programs
therefore invite applicants who have scores of above 210-220.
-
Step I greater than 220. If they
are less than that – the applicant must be very well known to us and
have desirable features – ie research, great letters, AOA.
-
The problem with USMLE scores is
that they are only comparable within a specific medical school
group, but across different medical schools depending upon the
emphasis on the USMLE will determine the USMLE score. There is a
tendency in surgical specialty programs to emphasize USMLE scores.
The data does not support the specific use as USMLE scores as a
determiner of who to interview. There is some vague association
with the high and low ends of USMLE scores and later in-service
results. Students with extremely high USMLE scores seem to do
better on in-service examinations and those with extremely low USMLE
scores appear to do poorly. However, with the vast majority of
students that fall in the middle, there appears to be very little or
no correlation with USMLE scores and success in urology residency.
-
How important do you consider
“audition” electives to be? What advice would you give students as
they are considering taking an elective at an institution to which
they’ll be making application for residency?
-
Audition electives are important
only in that it may help you get to know people. A known commodity
is less of a risk!! These electives can also work against the
applicant if they are deemed inappropriate.
-
We advise students to do audition
electives only if there is a particular program they are very
interested in and need to know more about. Secondly, we might
encourage audition electives for applicants with a mediocre academic
record, but who make a strong impression in a one-on-one
relationship. We try to limit the number of audition electives done
by senior students to one or two.
-
Very effective – Consider two, your
first choice and a second for comparison.
-
These can be an important rotation
for a student to participate in, however, the student should not
engage in more than two “away” rotations in otolaryngology. The
best strategy would be to identify a key program that you have a
good chance of matching in and that you would be very interested in
training at that program. The away rotation is critical for the
student to show exceptional and exemplary clinical performance and
therefore preparation prior to going on the away rotation is key.
Conversely, away rotations are not necessary for students depending
on how competitive they are relative to the applicant pool.
-
I think audition electives are very
important. We prefer candidates spend a month with us.
-
Additional electives at the
institution can be very powerful factors of selection in a residency
program; however, if the student does not do well on an out service
elective this can have a negative impact on selection. It is
probably most important to identify with an urologist that has
information concerning programs around the country and has contacts
throughout the country. Then do well on electives in your own
institution. This is probably better than to risk doing a rotation
at another institution. There are specific personal reasons to do
an elective at another institution. It is the best way to gauge
resident satisfaction at that institution, particularly, in
residency programs that are not as competitive. That experience may
help you select whether or not you plan to do a residency at a
specific institution.
|